Information processing apparatus and method of notifying verification result of program

ABSTRACT

An information processing apparatus includes a control unit, a storage unit configured to store a program to be executed by the control unit, a verification unit configured to read the program from the storage unit and to verify the read program, and a light-emitting unit configured to be changed to a predetermined light-emitting state or to be changed from the predetermined light-emitting state based on a result of the verification of the program by the verification unit.

BACKGROUND Field of the Disclosure

The present disclosure relates to an information processing apparatus and the like that verifies a program that a control unit executes.

Description of the Related Art

As a method of detecting falsification of a boot code in an image forming apparatus (hereinafter, referred to as multifunctional peripheral (MFP)), there is a method in which a sub-central processing unit (CPU) loads a boot code to be executed by a main CPU before startup of the main CPU, and verifies whether the loaded boot code has not been falsified. As processing performed in a case where the sub-CPU detects falsification of the boot code, a method in which the sub-CPU controls a reset signal that is input to the main CPU in order to prevent startup of the main CPU, to maintain a reset state of the main CPU, is conceivable.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication (Translation of PCT Application) No. 2011-511331 discusses the technique of determining whether a first component has been falsified, and when the first component has not been falsified, booting of the first component is started to update state information so as to indicate success of the booting, whereas when the first component has been falsified, booting of the first component is prevented.

SUMMARY

It is important to notify that the sub-CPU which detects falsification of the boot code is normally operating because whether the sub-CPU is normally operating relates to reliability of a system. An apparatus configured to continuously consume power in order to constantly notify the normal operation of the sub-CPU, however, leads to increase of power consumption.

According to embodiments of the present disclosure, an information processing apparatus includes a control unit, a storage unit configured to store a program to be executed by the control unit, a verification unit configured to read the program from the storage unit and to verify the read program, and a light-emitting unit configured to be changed to a predetermined light-emitting state or to be changed from the predetermined light-emitting state based on a result of the verification of the program by the verification unit.

Further features of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a multifunctional peripheral (MFP).

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a main central processing unit (CPU).

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a sub-CPU.

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a memory map of a flash read only memory (ROM).

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating processing by the sub-CPU.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating processing by the main CPU.

FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating lighting timing of a light-emitting diode (LED).

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

A first exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure is described below with reference to drawings.

A multifunctional peripheral (MFP) is described as an example of an information processing apparatus that executes a failure detection method when validity of a boot code (boot program) of a main central processing unit (CPU) 101 is verified (when processing to detect falsification of boot code is performed). The MFP is an image forming apparatus (printing apparatus) including an image forming function (print function). Unless otherwise noted, the present disclosure is applicable to a single apparatus as well as a system including a plurality of apparatuses as long as functions according to the present exemplary embodiment are executed.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of an MFP 1. In FIG. 1, the main CPU 101 serves as a first control unit that controls the whole of the MFP 101.

A dynamic random access memory (DRAM) 102 is a volatile memory, and stores programs to be executed by the main CPU 101 and functions as a work area of temporary data.

An operation unit 103 includes a touch screen, and notifies the main CPU 101 of operation performed by a user through an operation unit interface (I/F) 113.

A network I/F 104 is connected to a local area network (LAN) 130 to communicate with an external apparatus.

A printer unit 105 prints image data on a sheet. The printer unit 105 may be of any type. For example, it may be of an electrophotographic type or an inkjet type. A scanner unit 106 optically reads an image on a sheet, and converts the read image into an electric signal, thereby generating a scanned image. A facsimile (FAX) 107 is connected to a public line 110 to perform facsimile communication with an external apparatus. The main CPU 101 executes various kinds of programs including a main CPU basic input/output system (BIOS) 401 described below, to control a print function, a read function, and a FAX function respectively provided by the printer unit 105, the scanner unit 106, and the FAX 107.

A hard disk drive (HDD) 108 is a nonvolatile storage device, and stores programs to be executed by the main CPU 101, such as an operating system (OS). Further, the HDD 108 is used as a spool area for a print job, a scan job, etc. The HDD 108 is also used as an area that stores the scanned image for reuse.

A bus 109 is a signal bus that connects the modules to one another to carry out communication. The public line 110 connects the FAX 107 and the external apparatus to each other. An image processing unit 111 is an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). The image processing unit 111 converts a print job received by the network I/F 104 into an image suitable for printing by the printer unit 105, and performs processing such as noise reduction, color space conversion, rotation, and compression on the scanned image read by the scanner unit 106. Further, the image processing unit 111 performs image processing of the scanned image stored in the HDD 108.

A flash read-only memory (ROM) 112 is a nonvolatile memory, and stores a program including BIOS that is a boot code to be executed by the main CPU 101. Further, the flash ROM 112 stores default setting values of the MFP 1.

The operation unit I/F 113 connects the operation unit 103 and the signal bus 109 to each other.

A serial peripheral interface (SPI) bus 114 connects the main CPU 101, the flash ROM 112, and a sub-CPU 115 to one another. In the present exemplary embodiment, the main CPU 101 and the sub-CPU 115 each act as a master device of the flash ROM 112.

The sub-CPU 115 serves as a second control unit that loads the boot code (BIOS) of the main CPU 101 from the flash ROM 112 and verifies whether the boot code has not been falsified, at the time of starting up the MFP 1. In other words, the sub-CPU 115 verifies validity of the BIOS. In a case where it is determined that the BIOS has not been falsified (BIOS is valid), the sub-CPU 115 cancels a reset state of the main CPU 101.

As an example of a method of detecting falsification of data, the present exemplary embodiment adopts the following method. For example, data to be verified, a digital signature of the data (hash value of original data encrypted with private key), and a public key of the digital signature (public key in pairs with private key) are stored in one or a plurality of memories. Then, a hash value is calculated from the data to be verified, and the digital signature is decrypted with the public key to obtain the hash value of the original data. The sub-CPU 115 compares the two hash values. When the two hash values are coincident with each other, the sub-CPU 115 determines that the data to be verified is valid and has not been falsified. When the two hash values are different from each other, the sub-CPU 115 determines that the data to be verified is not valid and has been falsified. Examples of the public key encryption method includes RSA-2048 and elliptic curve digital signature algorithm (ECDSA). The method of detecting falsification, however, is not limited to this method. The data to be verified (e.g., BIOS 401), the digital signature thereof (e.g., BIOS signature 402), and the public key to decrypt the digital signature (e.g., public key for BIOS signature 402) may be stored in the same memory (e.g., flash ROM 112). Further, the data to be verified (e.g., firmware (FW) 404) and the digital signature thereof (e.g., FW signature 405) may be stored in the same memory (e.g., flash ROM 112), and the public key to decrypt the digital signature may be stored in another memory (e.g., one-time programmable (OTP) memory 304).

A signal 116 is a control signal to turn on or off a light-emitting diode (LED) 121, and is provided from a general purpose input/output (GPIO) port of the sub-CPU 115 to the LED 121. The sub-CPU 115 outputs a signal 116 of a high (Hi) level or a low (Lo) level from a GPIO 303 through software control, thereby turning on or off the LED 121 at any timing.

A signal 117 is a reset signal, and is provided from another GPIO port 312 of the sub-CPU 115 to a reset terminal of the main CPU 101. The reset state of the main CPU 101 is canceled by the reset signal 117. When the reset signal 117 is shifted from the “Lo” level to the “Hi” level by GPIO port 312, the reset state of the main CPU 101 is canceled.

A power supply control unit 118 is an integrated circuit and controls power supply to each of the modules inside the MFP 1. A power line 119 supplies power to each of the modules from the power supply control unit 118. A power supply line 120 is supplied with a commercial alternating-current (AC) power. The LED 121 is a means that enables a person such as a user and a service engineer to recognize a current state of the apparatus, and is a light-emitting device driven by the LED signal 116 output from the sub-CPU 115. In other words, the LED 121 takes two power states (first power state and a second power state), namely, a lighting state (corresponding to on state) and an non-lighting state (corresponding to off state), and the LED 121 in the lighting state and the LED 121 in the non-lighting state are visually distinguishable by the person.

When a power source of the system is turned on, a reset circuit 122 first resets the modules including the sub-CPU 115 and the main CPU 101. After a predetermined delay time has elapsed after the voltage of the power supply reaches a prescribed voltage, the reset circuit 112 shifts a reset signal 123 for the sub-CPU 115 from the “Lo” level to the “Hi” level. The signal 123 is a sub-CPU reset signal, and is provided from the reset circuit 122 to a reset terminal of the sub-CPU 115. When the sub-CPU reset signal 123 is shifted to the “Hi” level, the reset state of the sub-CPU 115 is canceled, and the sub-CPU 115 performs processing illustrated in a flowchart of FIG. 5 described below.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of the main CPU 101. In FIG. 2, a CPU core 201 provides a basic function of the CPU. An SPI Master 202 is connected as an SPI master device to an external SPI device (flash ROM 112), and reads and writes data. An SPI bus 206 (114) electrically connects the SPI Master 202 to the external SPI device. The SPI Master 202 is used when the main CPU 101 reads data from the flash ROM 112. A signal bus 209 connects the modules of the main CPU 101 to one another. When the reset signal 117 is at the “Lo” level, the main CPU 101 (CPU core 201) is in the reset state. When the reset signal 117 is at the “Hi” level, the main CPU 101 (CPU core 201) is in a reset-canceled state. When the reset signal 117 is shifted from the “Lo” level (reset state) to the “Hi” level (reset-canceled state), the CPU core 201 first loads the BIOS 401 of the main CPU 101 stored in the flash ROM 112 to the DRAM 102, and executes the BIOS 401.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of the sub-CPU 115. In FIG. 3, a CPU core 301 provides a basic function of the CPU. An SPI Master 302 is connected as an SPI master device to the external SPI device (flash ROM 112) through an SPI bus 306 (114), and reads and writes data. The SPI Master 302 is used when the CPU core 301 reads data from the flash ROM 112. The GPIO 303 outputs the LED signal 116 to the external device (LED 121). The GPIO 312 outputs the reset signal 117 to control cancelation of the reset state of the main CPU 101, to the main CPU 101.

A public key to decrypt the digital signature of a FW of the sub-CPU 115 is written into the OTP memory 304 when the memory 304 is manufactured. Further, an address on the flash ROM 112 where Tag (information representing storage address of firmware of sub-CPU 115) is stored is written into the OTP memory 304. The data written into the OTP memory 304 is unrewritable after being written once and is secured.

A static random access memory (SRAM) 305 is used as a work memory inside the sub-CPU 115. An encryption processing unit 308 is a hardware circuit, and decrypts a digital signature (e.g., digital signature of firmware of sub-CPU 115 and digital signature of BIOS 401 of main CPU 101) using a public key. A signal bus 309 is connected to each of the modules inside the sub-CPU 115. A Boot ROM 310 is a mask ROM, and stores a boot code of the sub-CPU 115. The contents in the Boot ROM 310 is unrewritable and secured.

In a case where the reset signal input to the sub-CPU 115 is at the “Lo” level, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) is in the reset state. In a case where the reset signal is at the “Hi” level, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) is in the reset-canceled state. When the reset signal is shifted from the reset state to the reset-canceled state, the CPU core 301 first loads the own boot code from the Boot ROM 310 and executes the boot code.

A Crypto RAM 311 is a volatile memory storing data under high confidentiality used by the encryption processing unit 308, etc.

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a memory map of the flash ROM 112. The flash ROM 112 stores the main CPU BIOS 401, the BIOS signature 402 as the digital signature of the BIOS 401, the sub-CPU FW 404, and the FW signature 405 as the digital signature of the sub-CPU FW 404. The main CPU BIOS 401 is a boot code of the main CPU 101. The BIOS signature 402 is an RSA signature value corresponding to the hash value of the BIOS 401. The sub-CPU FW 404 includes a boot code of the sub-CPU 115 and a public key to decrypt the BIOS signature 402. The FW signature 405 is an ECDSA signature value of the sub-CPU FW 404. Alternatively, the FW signature 405 may be an ECDSA signature value at a specific portion of a head part of the sub-CPU FW 404.

The flash ROM 112 further stores a Tag 403 representing a head address of a memory area storing the sub-CPU FW 404. The address of the Tag 403 itself is stored in the OTP memory 304.

The flash ROM 112 further stores information referred to as ROM-ID. A head address of the main CPU BIOS 401, a size, and an address of the BIOS signature 402 are stored in the ROM-1D 406.

In the present exemplary embodiment, an example is illustrated in which only one set of the main CPU BIOS 401, the BIOS signature 402, the Tag 403, the sub-CPU FW 404, and the FW signature 405 is stored. Alternatively, a plurality of sets may be stored and switched to each other and used as necessary.

Next, a procedure of processing by the sub-CPU 115 according to the present exemplary embodiment is described with reference to a flowchart of FIG. 5. The flowchart is started by the sub-CPU 115 reset of which has been canceled.

Processing in steps S501 to S504 described below corresponds to processing to verify the FW 404 of the sub-CPU 115 (processing to detect falsification of FW 404).

In step S501, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) executes the boot code of the sub-CPU 115 inside the Boot ROM 310. Then, the sub-CPU 115 loads the sub-CPU FW 404 from the flash ROM 112 to the SRAM 305 through the SPI bus 114 based on the boot code.

In step S502, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) uses the encryption processing unit 308 to decrypt the FW signature 405 stored in the flash ROM 112 with the public key inside the OTP memory 304 to obtain a correct hash value.

In step S503, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) uses the encryption processing unit 308 to calculate the hash value of the sub-CPU FW 404 loaded in the SRAM 305.

In step S504, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) compares the hash value obtained in step S502 with the hash value calculated in step S503, to determine whether the both hash values are equal to each other. In a case where the both hash values are not equal to (not coincident with) each other (NO in step S504), the processing ends. In the case where the processing ends here, the LED 121 is not turned on at all in the present exemplary embodiment. Accordingly, the person (user or service engineer) monitoring the state of the LED 121 after the MFP 1 is turned on can recognize possibility of sub-CPU 115 failure or abnormality (e.g., falsification) of the FW 404 of the sub-CPU 115.

In a case where the both hash values are equal to (coincident with) each other (YES in step S504), the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) loads the sub-CPU FW 404 from the flash ROM 112 to the SRAM 305 in step S505. In step S506, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) executes the sub-CPU FW 404 loaded to the SRAM 305, and controls the GPIO 303 based on the FW 404 to drive the LED signal 116, thereby turning on the LED 121. The lighting of the LED 121 is maintained by the LED signal 116 from the GPIO 303 while validity of the main CPU BIOS 401 is being verified as described below. The processing in step S505 may be omitted, and the FW 404 loaded to the SRAM 305 may be executed in step S501.

The FW 404 of the sub-CPU 115 is executed and the LED 121 is turned on in the above-described manner. Therefore, lighting of the LED 121 can notify the user that the FW 404 of the sub-CPU 115 and the sub-CPU 115 itself have no abnormality. In contrast, non-lighting of the LED 121 can notify the user that the FW 404 of the sub-CPU 115 may have abnormality (falsification) or the sub-CPU 115 itself may be in failure.

In step S507, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) loads a ROM-ID 406 from the flash ROM 112 to the Crypto RAM 311.

IN step S508, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) obtains the address of the main CPU BIOS 401 and the address of the BIOS signature 402 from the ROM-ID 406 loaded to the Crypto RAM 311.

Processing in steps S509 to S513 described below corresponds to processing to verify the BIOS 401 of the main CPU 101 (processing to detect falsification of BIOS 401).

In step S509, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) loads the BIOS signature 402 to the SRAM 305.

In step S510, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) uses the encryption processing unit 308 to decrypt the BIOS signature 402 with the public key included in the sub-CPU FW 404, thereby obtaining a hash value.

In step S511, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) loads the main CPU BIOS 401 from the flash ROM 112 to the SRAM 305.

In step S512, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) uses the encryption processing unit 308 to calculate the hash value of the main CPU BIOS 401 from the main CPU BIOS 401 loaded to the SRAM 305.

In step S513, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) compares the hash value obtained in step S510 with the hash value calculated in step S512, to determine whether the both hash values are equal to each other. In a case where the both hash values are equal to (coincident with) each other (YES in step S513), the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) controls the signal 116 through the GPIO 303 to turn off the LED 121 in step S514. Although it is more desirable that the LED 121 continue the non-lighting state during a period when the sub-CPU 115 can control the LED 121 through the GPIO 303, the LED 121 is supposed to continue the non-lighting state at least until the sub-CPU 115 cancels the reset state of the main CPC 101. In other words, the LED 121 continues the non-lighting state until the sub-CPU 115 loads the BIOS 401 stored in the flash ROM 112 to make the main CPU 101 operable. Further, in step S515, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) shifts the reset signal 117 to the “Hi” level through the GPIO 312, and cancels the reset state of the main CPU 101. In this case, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) continues the non-lighting state of the LED 121 without turning on the LED 121 again after the reset state of the main CPU 101 is canceled.

Thereafter, in step S516, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) enters a sleep state that requires the lowest power consumption, and maintains the sleep state. The sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) maintains output of the signal 116 from the GPIO 303 in the sleep state. In other words, the LED 121 remains in an off state while the reset state of the main CPU 101 is canceled (state in and after step S516). The LED 121 is switched from the lighting state to the non-lighting state in the above-described manner, which makes it possible to reduce the power consumption as compared with a case where the lighting state is maintained. In other words, the non-lighting state of the LED 121 requires only lower power consumption per unit time than the lighting state.

Further, the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) maintains the output of the signal 117 from the GPIO 312 at the “Hi” level in the sleep state. In other words, the main CPU 101 remains in the reset-canceled state.

It is unnecessary for the sub-CPU 115 according to the present exemplary embodiment to return to a normal state after entering the sleep state once. Therefore, the sub-CPU 115 does not need to receive an interrupt signal. If the sub-CPU 115 is used for purposes other than falsification detection, however, the sub-CPU 115 may receive the interrupt signal and return to the normal state.

In contrast, in a case where the both hash values are not equal to (not coincident with) each other (NO in step S513), the sub-CPU 115 (CPU core 301) controls the signal 116 through the GPIO 303 to blink the LED 121 in step S517. Blinking may be performed in a pattern in which the lighting state and the non-lighting state are alternately repeated every second. It is desirable that the LED 121 continue the blinking state during the period when the sub-CPU 115 can control the LED 121 through the GPIO 303. Thus, blinking of the LED 121 can notify the main CPU 101 that abnormality of the BIOS 401 has occurred due to falsification, etc. Further, blinking of the LED can reduce the power consumption as compared with continuous lighting of the LED 121. In other words, the blinking of the LED 121 consumes lower power per unit time than the lighting state. The blinking of the LED consumes higher power per unit time than the non-lighting state.

As described above, the sub-CPU 115 calculates the hash value of the sub-CPU FW 404 loaded from the flash ROM 112 and compares the calculated hash value with the correct hash value, thereby verifying validity of the sub-CPU FW 404 stored in the flash ROM 112. In a case where it is determined by the verification that the sub-CPU FW 404 is valid, the sub-CPU 115 executes the sub-CPU FW 404 loaded from the flash ROM 112, and verifies validity of the main CPU BIOS 401. In other words, the sub-CPU FW 404 is also a verification program to verify validity of the main CPU BIOS 401. The sub-CPU FW 404 includes a program code that starts verification of validity of the main CPU BIOS 401 after turning on the LED 121. The LED 121 is turned on for a time in the above-described manner, which makes it possible to notify that the sub-CPU 115 correctly executes the sub-CPU FW 404.

The sub-CPU 115 loads the main CPU BIOS 401 from the flash ROM 112 based on the verification program, and calculates the hash value and compares the calculated hash value with the correct hash value in a manner similar to the verification of the sub-CPU FW 404. Thus, validity of the main CPU BIOS 401 stored in the flash ROM 112 is verified. After the verification of the main CPU BIOS 401 ends, the sub-CPU 115 turns off the LED 121. Turning off the LED 121 can reduce the power consumption as compared continuous lighting of the LED 121.

More specifically, if it is determined that the main CPU BIOS 401 is valid, the sub-CPU 115 maintains the non-lighting state of the LED 121 during the period when the sub-CPU 115 itself can control the lighting state and the non-lighting state of the LED 121. If it is determined that the main CPU BIOS 401 is not valid, the sub-CPU 115 controls the LED 121 so as to alternately repeat the non-lighting state and the lighting state during the period when the sub-CPU 115 itself can control the lighting state and the non-lighting state of the LED 121. Accordingly, validity/invalidity of the main CPU BIOS 401 can be determined and notified without maintaining the lighting state of the LED 121.

Next, a procedure of processing by the main CPU 101 according to the present exemplary embodiment is described with reference to a flowchart of FIG. 6.

In step S601, the main CPU 101 (CPU core 201) loads the main CPU BIOS 401 stored in the flash ROM 112 to the DRAM 102 immediately after the reset state is canceled.

Then, in step S602, the main CPU 101 (CPU core 201) executes the BIOS 401, and initializes input/output of the main CPU 101 based on the BIOS 401.

In step S603, the main CPU 101 (CPU core 201) loads the OS from the HDD 108 to the DRAM 102.

Further, in step S604, the main CPU 101 (CPU core 201) starts up the OS loaded to the DRAM 102.

Subsequently, in step S605, the main CPU 101 (CPU core 201) initializes the printer unit 105, the scanner unit 106, the FAX 107, the image processing unit 111, the network I/F 104, and the operation unit 103, to make the MFP 1 operable.

Next, lighting timing of the LED 121 according to the present exemplary embodiment is described with reference to a timing chart of FIG. 7. In FIG. 7, a timing chart 701 is a chart in a case where no abnormality has occurred to the FW 404 of the sub-CPU 115 and the CPU 115 itself, and no abnormality has occurred to the BIOS 401 of the main CPU 101 either (normal state). In the timing chart 701, at time T0 (when reset circuit 122 cancels reset state of sub-CPU 115), the LED 121 is turned off (OFF). At time T1 (when processing for detecting falsification of BIOS 401 starts: step S506 in FIG. 5), the FW 404 turns on the LED 121 (ON). At time T2 (when processing for detecting falsification of BIOS 401 ends: step S514 in FIG. 5), the FW 404 turns off the LED 121 (OFF).

A timing chart 702 is a chart in a case where abnormality has occurred to the FW 404 of the sub-CPU 115 or the sub-CPU 115 itself. Also in the timing chart 702, at time T0, the LED 121 is turned off (OFF). Thereafter, the LED 121 is not turned on and remains off (OFF) because the FW 404 of the sub-CPU 115 is not executed.

A timing chart 703 is a chart in a case where abnormality has occurred to the BIOS 401. Also in the timing chart 703, at time T0, the LED 121 is turned off (OFF). In the timing chart 703, the FW 404 is executed, and the LED 121 is accordingly turned on (ON) at time T1. Further, abnormality of the BIOS 401 is detected by the FW 404, and the LED 121 accordingly blinks (repeats ON/OFF) after time T2.

As described above, the MFP 1 according to the present exemplary embodiment continuously lights the LED 121 while validity of the BIOS 401 of the main CPU 101 is being verified by the FW 404 which is executed by the sub-CPU 115. In the case where abnormality of the BIOS 401 caused by falsification, etc. is not detected as a result of the verification, the LED 121 is turned off. As described above, since the LED 121 is not all the time turned on when the BIOS 401 is normal, it is possible to reduce power consumption during operation of the MFP 1. In contrast, in the case where abnormality of the BIOS 401 caused by falsification, etc. is detected as a result of the processing to detect falsification of the BIOS 401, the MFP 1 blinks the LED 121. Thus, the blinking of the LED 121 can notify abnormality of the BIOS 401 (boot code of main CPU 101) caused by falsification, etc. Further, the power consumption of the LED 121 can be reduced in the blinking state as compared with the continuous lighting state.

In the present exemplary embodiment, detection of the falsification is notified to the user by lighting and non-lighting of the LED 121; however, notification can be made other than by the LED, for example, buzzer sound, voice, or a radio signal also can achieve the notification purpose. For example, in a case of the buzzer sound, the buzzer sound is made during the processing for detecting falsification of the BIOS 401, and the buzzer sound is stopped when abnormality such as falsification is not detected. However, the buzzer sound may be intermittently made when abnormality such as falsification is detected.

A second exemplary embodiment is described below. In the first exemplary embodiment, the FW 404 turns on the LED 121. In the MFP 1 according to the present exemplary embodiment, the LED 121 is automatically turned on without using the FW 404 when the reset circuit 122 cancels the reset state of the sub-CPU 115. For example, a switch circuit may be provided between the LED 121 and the power supply, and switching of the switch circuit may be controlled by either the signal 116 from the sub-CPU 115 or the reset signal of the sub-CPU 115 output from the reset circuit 122. In such a circuit configuration, the LED 121 is automatically turned on without through the FW 404 when the reset state of the sub-CPU 115 is canceled, and the FW 404 turns off or blinks the LED 121 based on the result of the processing for detecting falsification of the BIOS 401 by the sub-CPU 115. In other words, as compared with the timing chart in FIG. 7, the LED 121 is in the lighting state also during a period from time T0 to time T1 in the MFP 1 according to the present exemplary embodiment.

In the present exemplary embodiment, the processing for turning on the LED 121 in step S506 of FIG. 5 is omitted because it is unnecessary for the FW 404 to turn on the LED 121 at time T1.

Other Embodiments

Embodiment(s) of the present disclosure can also be realized by a computer of a system or apparatus that reads out and executes computer executable instructions (e.g., one or more programs) recorded on a storage medium (which may also be referred to more fully as a ‘non-transitory computer-readable storage medium’) to perform the functions of one or more of the above-described embodiment(s) and/or that includes one or more circuits (e.g., application specific integrated circuit (ASIC)) for performing the functions of one or more of the above-described embodiment(s), and by a method performed by the computer of the system or apparatus by, for example, reading out and executing the computer executable instructions from the storage medium to perform the functions of one or more of the above-described embodiment(s) and/or controlling the one or more circuits to perform the functions of one or more of the above-described embodiment(s). The computer may comprise one or more processors (e.g., central processing unit (CPU), micro processing unit (MPU)) and may include a network of separate computers or separate processors to read out and execute the computer executable instructions. The computer executable instructions may be provided to the computer, for example, from a network or the storage medium. The storage medium may include, for example, one or more of a hard disk, a random-access memory (RAM), a read only memory (ROM), a storage of distributed computing systems, an optical disk (such as a compact disc (CD), digital versatile disc (DVD), or Blu-ray Disc (BD)™), a flash memory device, a memory card, and the like.

While the present disclosure includes exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.

This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-225480, filed Nov. 30, 2018, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An information processing apparatus, comprising: a light-emitting device; a plurality of processors including at least a first processor and a second processor; at least one memory storing one or more programs, wherein the one or more programs include instructions, which when executed by the first processor, cause the information processing apparatus to: change the light-emitting device to a first light-emitting state; read a program, the program configured to be executed by the second processor; perform a verification process for determining whether the read program is valid; if a result of the verification process is a first result, change the light-emitting device from the first light-emitting state to a non-lighting state; and if the result of the verification process is a second result, change light-emitting device from the first light-emitting state to a second light-emitting state different from the first light-emitting state.
 2. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein, in the case where the program is valid as the first result of the verification process, the light-emitting device is changed from the first light-emitting state to the non-lighting state.
 3. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein, in a case where the program is not valid as the second result of the verification process, the light-emitting device is changed from the first light-emitting state to the second light-emitting state.
 4. The information processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the second light-emitting state is a blinking state.
 5. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the light-emitting device is in the first light-emitting state before the verification process is started.
 6. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the instructions, when executed by the first processor, cause the information processing apparatus to: control light emission of the light-emitting device.
 7. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the light-emitting device is a light-emitting diode (LED).
 8. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the one or more programs include a verification program, wherein the verification program includes instructions, which when executed by the first processor, cause the information processing apparatus to: perform the verification process for determining whether the read program is valid.
 9. The information processing apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the first processor reads the verification program from the at least one memory and verifies the read verification program, and in a case where the verification program is valid as a result of the verification of the verification program by the first processor, the verification unit executes the verification program to verify the program.
 10. The information processing apparatus according to claim 9, wherein, in a case where the verification program is not valid as the result of the verification of the verification program by the verification unit first processor, the state of the light-emitting unit is not changed.
 11. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first processor cancels a reset state of the second processor in a case where the program is valid as the first result of the verification process, and wherein the control unit second processor canceled from the reset state executes the program.
 12. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the information processing apparatus is an apparatus including a print function.
 13. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the information processing apparatus is an apparatus including a read function.
 14. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the information processing apparatus is an apparatus including a print function and a read function.
 15. A method, performed at an information processing apparatus with a light-emitting device, a plurality of processors including at least a first processor and a second processor, and at least one memory storing one or more programs, the method comprising: changing the light-emitting device to a first light-emitting state; reading a program, the program configured to be executed by the second processor; performing a verification process for determining whether the read program is valid; if a result of the verification process is a first result, changing the light-emitting device from the first light-emitting state to a non-lighting state; and if the result of the verification process is a second result, changing the light-emitting device from the first light-emitting state to a second light-emitting state different from the first light-emitting state.
 16. An information processing apparatus, comprising: a notification device; a plurality of processors including at least a first processor and a second processor; at least one memory storing one or more programs, wherein the one or more programs include instructions, which when executed by the first processor, cause the information processing apparatus to: control the notification device to notify a person of a first notification; read a program, the program configured to be executed by the second processor; perform a verification process for determining whether the read program is valid; if a result of the verification process is a first result, control the notification device to notify a person of a second notification different from the first notification; and if the result of the verification process is a second result, control the notification device to notify a person of a third notification different from the second notification.
 17. The information processing apparatus according to claim 16, wherein the notification device is a sound-outputting device.
 18. The information processing apparatus according to claim 17, wherein, in the case where the program is valid as the first result of the verification process, the sound-outputting device stops a buzzer sound.
 19. The information processing apparatus according to claim 17, wherein, in the case where the program is not valid as the second result of the verification process, the sound-outputting device intermittently outputs a buzzer sound.
 20. The information processing apparatus according to claim 16, wherein the first processor cancels a reset state of the second processor in a case where the program is valid as the first result of the verification process, and wherein the second processor, the reset state of which is canceled, executes the program. 